CIOPages
AI & AutomationMedium Complexity

Buyer's Guide: Synthetic Data Generation

Synthetic data generators create artificial data that behaves like real data, for analytics, software testing and AI training, without exposing the people in the original. Six approaches, from tabular synthetic data and test data platforms to open-core libraries, design-driven generation and synthetic data for AI models.

11 min read 6 vendors evaluated Updated October 2026
Section 1

Executive Summary

Synthetic data is only useful if it is realistic enough to trust and different enough to share. Every product in this guide is a trade-off between the two.

Synthetic data is generated to match the patterns of real data without containing real records. Teams use it to share data across departments and partners, to fill test environments without copying production, and to train or evaluate AI models when real data is scarce or sensitive. The data privacy guide covers consent and subject rights; the test automation guide covers test execution. This guide covers producing the data.

The approaches differ by use case and data type. Tabular synthetic data platforms serve analytics and data sharing. Test data platforms serve engineering teams. Open-core libraries serve data scientists. Design-driven generators create data from rules without touching production. Platforms for AI generate text, images and simulations for model training.

6 approaches, one vendor named for each
3 main uses: sharing, testing, AI training
3 ownership changes recorded in this guide's sources

Section 2

Why Synthetic Data Is a Separate Purchase

Privacy rules and security risk limit who can use production data. Masking removes direct identifiers but can leave records re-identifiable, and copying production into test environments widens the attack surface. Synthetic data offers another route, and public bodies recognize it. NIST says agencies should decide upon a data-sharing model, such as publishing de-identified data, publishing synthetic data based on identified data, providing a query interface that incorporates de-identification, or sharing data in non-public protected enclaves.

🎯
Strategic Impact
Three questions sort the shortlist. Is the goal data sharing, software testing or AI training? Is the data tabular, relational, unstructured text or images? And how will you measure both privacy and usefulness before anyone relies on the output?

Privacy guarantees vary by product. MOSTLY AI describes generating high-fidelity synthetic data with built-in differential privacy using the TabularARGN model architecture, with support for complex tabular and textual datasets. DataCebo describes creating synthetic data with differential privacy guarantees. Ask each vendor which privacy measure it reports and what an attacker could still learn.


Section 3

Open Source, Platform, or Test Data Suite

Teams choose among open-source libraries run by data scientists, commercial platforms with governance and privacy reporting, or test data suites that combine masking, subsetting and generation. Open source is flexible and cheap to start. Platforms add evaluation, access controls and support. Test data suites fit engineering workflows and database relationships.

Some products run where the data is. MOSTLY AI describes creating synthetic data locally in a Python environment, with the user in full control of the data. Test data products keep relational structure intact. Tonic.ai describes transforming sensitive production databases into high-fidelity, referentially intact test data. Syntho describes combining synthetic data masking, rule-based synthetic data and AI-generated synthetic data in one synthetic test data management platform.

Model What you get What you take on
Open-source library Models and code for generation Evaluation, governance and support
Synthetic data platform Generation, privacy reporting and sharing A platform to run and license
Test data suite Masking, subsetting and generation for testing Integration with databases and pipelines
Design-driven generator Data from rules without production access Writing and maintaining the rules
AI data platform Text, image or simulation data for models Validating that models learn the right things
⚠️
Common Pitfall
Assuming synthetic means private. A model trained too closely on real records can reproduce them. Require a privacy evaluation on every dataset before it leaves the controlled environment, and record who approved its release.

Section 4

How do you evaluate Synthetic Data Generation?

Evaluate these products on your own data. The capabilities that decide results are fidelity, privacy measurement, relational and multi-table support, unstructured data, rule and constraint control, deployment location, and integration with pipelines.

Unstructured and AI uses are growing. Tonic.ai describes detecting, redacting and synthesizing sensitive data in unstructured datasets to develop and fine-tune LLM and AI models. NVIDIA says NeMo Safe Synthesizer creates privacy-safe versions of sensitive data with default configurations designed to meet data privacy regulations such as HIPAA and GDPR. Rendered.ai describes simulation for any CV sensor type, including Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), infrared, multispectral, hyperspectral, X-ray, EO and RGB.

Capability What it does Buyer translation
Fidelity Matches statistics and relationships Compare analyses on real and synthetic data.
Privacy measurement Reports re-identification risk Ask which measures and thresholds apply.
Multi-table support Keeps keys and relationships Essential for test databases.
Unstructured data Text, documents and images Match to your AI use cases.
Rules and constraints Controls values and edge cases Needed for test scenarios.
Deployment Runs in your environment or the vendor's Decides whether real data leaves.
Pipeline integration Feeds CI, data platforms and ML Ask about APIs and connectors.
Governance Approvals, lineage and audit Shows who released which dataset.
💡
Evaluation Tip
Generate a synthetic copy of one sensitive table and run three analyses your analysts already trust on both versions. Then ask a security team to try to find real records in the synthetic copy.

Section 5

Vendors in Synthetic Data Generation

Representative vendors include DataCebo, GenRocket, K2view, MOSTLY AI, NVIDIA and Tonic.ai. The list is alphabetical, is not a ranking, and is not for sale. How we choose vendors

The approaches below differ by use case and data type. Several vendors cover more than one, so each approach describes where a product is strongest.

This market has consolidated quickly. A request for gretel.ai is answered by nvidia.com. YData says it has been acquired by KPMG. MOSTLY AI's site describes MOSTLY AI as powered by Syntho. Ask any vendor that has changed hands about roadmap, pricing and support.

How the market divides
Tabular synthetic data
High-fidelity synthetic tables with privacy controls.
Fits analytics and data sharing teams
Test data platforms
Referentially intact test data and unstructured redaction.
Fits engineering and QA teams
Data product platforms
Governed data products for testing and AI.
Fits enterprises with many source systems
Open-core libraries
Synthetic data models data scientists can extend.
Fits data science teams
Design-driven generation
Data defined by rules, without production data.
Fits testing with strict data controls
Synthetic data for AI
Text, simulation and world models for training AI.
Fits AI and robotics teams
6 vendors named — one per approach, alphabetical within each
Vendor Approach Where it fits
K2view Data product platforms Governed data products for testing and AI
GenRocket Design-driven generation Rule-designed synthetic test data
DataCebo Open-core libraries SDV open-core synthetic data
NVIDIA Synthetic data for AI Synthetic data for agentic and physical AI
MOSTLY AI Tabular synthetic data Synthetic tables with differential privacy
Tonic.ai Test data platforms Test data and unstructured de-identification

One vendor was chosen for each approach after the approaches were written, and a row here is not for sale. About twenty vendors sell synthetic or test data products. Vendors, named here or not, can present their own case in the Spotlight below.

🔎
Market Insight
Synthetic data now extends to physical AI. NVIDIA describes world foundation models and open data processing, training and evaluation frameworks for developing physical AI. DataCebo says it is introducing generative relational models and launching SDV 2.0. Match the vendor to the data your models actually need.

Section 6

How much should you budget for Synthetic Data Generation?

Synthetic data is priced by usage, data volume, users or platform subscription, and test data suites by environments and databases. Tonic.ai says its Free tier includes $5 in monthly usage credits, with no credit card required. Tonic.ai says Fabricate usage is measured in tokens. Ask each vendor for the pricing unit and how it grows with tables, rows and environments.

The value shows up in faster test cycles, data shared that could not be shared before, models trained on data that was previously off-limits, and fewer copies of production data. Model it on one use case before expanding.

Meter You are charged for Grows with Where it goes wrong
Usage or tokens Data generated Volume Repeated generation of the same data
Data volume Rows, tables or databases Scope Paying for unused tables
Users Data scientists and engineers Team size Seats for occasional users
Environments Test environments served Pipelines Each environment priced separately
Deployment Self-hosted or vendor cloud Security needs Self-hosting in top tiers only
What moves the bill
Volume Rows, tables, documents or tokens generated.
Use Sharing, testing or AI training workloads.
Control Self-hosting, governance and privacy reporting.
Annual Value Formula
Annual Value = Test Cycle Time Saved + Data Access Unlocked + Production Copies Retired + Model Development Accelerated − (Platform + Usage + Integration + Governance)

Section 7

How long does implementation take for Synthetic Data Generation?

Synthetic data programs depend on agreed measures of privacy and usefulness. Set them with privacy and data owners before generating anything.

Phase 1
Choose a Use Case (Weeks 1–3)

Pick one dataset and one use. Agree privacy and fidelity measures with data owners and privacy staff.

Phase 2
Generate and Evaluate (Weeks 3–8)

Generate data, run the agreed tests, and record results and approvals.

Phase 3
Integrate (Weeks 8–12)

Connect to the pipeline or environment that will use the data. Retire the production copy it replaces.

Phase 4
Expand (Ongoing)

Add datasets and uses. Re-evaluate when source data or models change.


Section 8

What should you ask vendors about Synthetic Data Generation?

Ask each vendor to answer on your data and use cases.

The short version
  1. Is the main use software testing?
    Yes Shortlist test data platforms and design-driven generators.
    No Continue.
  2. Is the main use analytics or data sharing?
    Yes Shortlist tabular synthetic data platforms.
    No Continue.
  3. Is the main use training AI models?
    Yes Shortlist synthetic data for AI.
    No An open-core library may be enough to start.

Section 9

Related Resources

From the directory

Vendors in this category

Directory listings for the Synthetic Data Generation space — independent of this guide’s evaluation. Compare profiles in the CIOPages directory, or claim yours.

Acceldata Claim
Alation Claim
Anomalo Claim
Apache Atlas Claim
Ataccama Claim
Atlan Claim
Bigeye Claim
CKAN Claim
Castor Claim
Collibra Claim
Browse all in the directory Work at one of these? See placements
The Throughline
One decision facing technology leaders, monthly.

Independent. No sponsorships. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tags:Synthetic DataTest Data ManagementPrivacy-Safe DataAI Training Data