Commvault vs Rubrik
Commvault and Rubrik are both evaluated in the CIOPages Backup & Disaster Recovery Buyer's Guide. The guide groups Commvault under Enterprise Data Mgmt and Rubrik under Security-Led.
| Attribute | Commvault | Rubrik |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Enterprise Data Mgmt | Security-Led |
| Best for | Large, regulated enterprises with diverse workloads and strict retention, compliance, and data-governance requirements | Security-driven organizations that want cyber-resilience and data-security posture, not just backup, on one platform |
From the Backup & Disaster Recovery Buyer's Guide, updated June 2026. 6 vendors evaluated.
Commvault
Depth is the argument for a regulated estate: the deepest heterogeneous workload and long-term-retention coverage, strong compliance and eDiscovery, and one policy framework spanning on-prem and cloud, with Metallic delivering the same protection as managed SaaS for teams that would rather not run infrastructure. It has historically carried an administration learning curve, packaging spans self-managed and SaaS so scoping the right edition takes care, and the breadth can be more than smaller estates need.
Rubrik
Backup framed as a security outcome, which is either the point or an expensive detour: built immutable-first, with ransomware investigation, sensitive-data discovery, and data-security-posture capabilities layered on top, plus a simple policy-driven UX and strong API automation. Pricing is premium relative to traditional backup, the security modules are where much of the value and the cost sit, and it is younger than the incumbents at the deepest, most exotic legacy workloads.
Also evaluated in this guide
Related comparisons
Editors choose the vendors and write the evaluations. Paying CIOPages does not change how a vendor is covered. Editorial policy