By: A Staff Writer
Updated on: May 20, 2023
Chaos Engineering is the science of introducing controlled disruptions into a system to assess its resilience and identify weaknesses. It aims to uncover hidden issues before they manifest unexpectedly, ensuring the system can withstand unpredictable disruptions. Essentially, Chaos Engineering is about breaking things on purpose but in a controlled manner to learn how to make systems more robust and resilient.
Chaos Engineering originated from large-scale distributed software systems, notably at Netflix, in response to the unique challenges posed by these complex systems. In 2010, Netflix introduced a tool called Chaos Monkey. It was designed to randomly disable servers in their production environment during business hours to ensure their system could tolerate server failures without impacting user experience.
This idea of intentional system disruption evolved and gained traction, becoming a broader discipline known as Chaos Engineering. Today, it’s used not only in software development and IT operations but also in other areas like networking, security, and even in non-technical fields where complex systems exist, such as economics and ecology.
In an era where downtime can lead to significant financial losses and damage a company’s reputation, Chaos Engineering is critical in ensuring system stability and reliability. Here are some key benefits:
System Resilience: By intentionally inducing failures, you can test and improve the system’s ability to handle and recover from disruptions.
Risk Mitigation: Chaos Engineering can expose hidden issues and potential system vulnerabilities, allowing teams to address them proactively.
Increased Confidence: Regular chaos experiments increase confidence in the system’s capability and the team’s preparedness to handle actual incidents.
Cost Saving: Detecting and fixing problems before they affect users or customers can lead to significant cost savings.
Netflix: The pioneer of Chaos Engineering, Netflix developed the Chaos Monkey tool to shut down servers to test system resilience randomly. This tool is part of the Simian Army, a suite of tools designed to test specific failures and ensure the resilience of Netflix’s infrastructure.
Amazon: Amazon uses a tool called the “Amazon Web Services (AWS) Fault Injection Simulator” to simulate faults and test system response, thereby improving the resilience of AWS.
Google: Google uses a software tool called DiRT (Disaster Recovery Testing) to conduct regular failure testing and improve system resilience. DiRT tests range from shutting down entire data centers to simulating internet outages.
Facebook: Facebook performs “Project Storm” drills, in which they simulate faults in their live systems to test the system’s resilience and their team’s incident response capabilities.
These examples highlight how major tech companies employ Chaos Engineering to improve their systems’ reliability, emphasizing this practice’s crucial role in today’s tech-dominated world.
A set of critical principles guides the practice of Chaos Engineering:
Start with a Hypothesis: Chaos Engineering isn’t about inducing chaos randomly; it begins with a hypothesis about how your system should behave in the face of adversity.
Define ‘Normal’: Chaos Engineering requires a clear understanding of your system’s ‘normal’ state, i.e., the ‘steady state.’ This state will be used as a baseline for comparison when disturbances are introduced.
Introduce Variables: Deliberately introduce variables that mirror potential real-world disruptions, such as server outages, software bugs, or network latency.
Minimize the ‘Blast Radius’: Experiments should start in a controlled and minimal scope to avoid adverse effects on the system or end users. The impact area is incrementally increased as confidence in the system grows.
Iterate and Learn: Chaos Engineering is a cycle. Each experiment should yield learnings to improve system robustness, and this iterative process continues with new hypotheses.
In the context of Chaos Engineering, ‘chaos’ doesn’t mean complete disorder or unpredictability. Instead, it refers to controlled disruptions introduced into a system to observe its reactions and resilience. The goal is not to induce genuine chaos but to prevent it by ensuring systems can withstand potential failures or disruptions.
The Chaos Engineering ecosystem is a broad and expanding field. It includes various tools and services that facilitate the design and execution of chaos experiments. Some noteworthy tools include:
Chaos Monkey: Developed by Netflix, this tool randomly shuts down servers to test the system’s resilience.
Gremlin: A comprehensive Chaos Engineering platform that allows teams to perform controlled chaos experiments on various system components, from servers to databases.
LitmusChaos: An open-source Chaos Engineering tool for Kubernetes environments, particularly useful in microservices architectures.
These tools are part of a growing ecosystem designed to support and streamline Chaos Engineering practices.
Microservices architecture, where applications are structured as a collection of loosely coupled services, has become increasingly popular. However, while it offers many benefits like scalability and flexibility, it also introduces new complexities and potential points of failure.
Chaos Engineering plays a critical role in ensuring the reliability of microservices. Testing individual services and their interactions can identify and address potential weaknesses. For instance, Netflix uses Chaos Kong, another tool from their Simian Army, to simulate the failure of an entire AWS region, testing how well their microservices-based architecture handles such a significant disruption.
Distributed systems are inherently complex, where components located on different networked hosts communicate and coordinate to achieve a common goal. Furthermore, the asynchronous nature and lack of a global clock can make the system’s behavior unpredictable, making it an ideal candidate for Chaos Engineering.
Google’s DiRT exercises, for example, are designed to ensure the resilience of their highly distributed systems. They can gracefully verify their systems’ capability to handle such disruptions by introducing controlled faults, like simulating data center outages.
Before beginning any Chaos Engineering experiment, it’s crucial to establish a hypothesis about how your system should behave when faced with certain disturbances. The hypothesis should be based on your understanding of the system’s architecture and expected behavior.
For example, Amazon’s AWS Fault Injection Simulator hypothesis might be: “If a single EC2 instance goes down in our load-balanced application, the application should not experience any downtime, as the traffic should be redirected to other healthy instances.”
The ‘steady state’ is the normal operating condition of your system, which serves as the benchmark against which experiment outcomes will be compared. Therefore, defining this state is essential before conducting chaos experiments.
For example, Netflix would define its streaming service’s steady state as the ability to deliver high-quality video to users continuously. Any deviation from this, such as buffering or poor video quality, would indicate a departure from the steady state during a chaos experiment.
To conduct Chaos Engineering experiments, you must identify variables that could affect the system’s stability. These variables include server failures, network latency, and database outages.
For instance, in the case of Google’s DiRT exercises, they consider a wide range of variables, from power failures at data centers to software bugs and even human errors, simulating these to test their systems’ resilience.
Chaos Engineering isn’t just about the technology; it’s also about the culture. Creating a culture of resiliency means fostering an environment where failure is recognized as an opportunity for learning and improvement.
Facebook exemplifies this with its “Project Storm” drills. Rather than punishing teams when something goes wrong, they encourage learning from these experiences, which improves their systems and incident response capabilities.
Before starting chaos experiments, it’s essential to identify key metrics to help measure the system’s behavior under chaos conditions. These metrics will depend on the application’s response times, error rates, and resource utilization.
In addition, having the proper monitoring tools is vital to collect and analyze these metrics during and after the chaos experiments. Tools like AWS CloudWatch, Google Cloud Monitoring, and open-source solutions like Prometheus and Grafana provide the ability to capture real-time data and provide insights into the system’s behavior under test conditions.
GameDays are a vital practice in implementing Chaos Engineering. Originated by Amazon, a GameDay is a dedicated, planned event where engineers intentionally inject failures into systems to identify weaknesses. The goal is to improve system understanding, foster better incident response, and ultimately improve customer experience.
For instance, Amazon Web Services (AWS) regularly holds GameDays to stress-test their systems and processes. As a result, these events have played a critical role in AWS’s ability to deliver reliable, robust cloud services.
Chaos Monkey is perhaps the most famous Chaos Engineering tool. Developed by Netflix, it randomly disables servers in their production environment to test their system’s resilience. Chaos Monkey is part of the broader Simian Army suite, which includes other tools like Chaos Kong (which simulates an outage of an entire Amazon Web Services region) and Latency Monkey (which introduces artificial delays to simulate service degradation).
Other notable tools include Gremlin, a fully-managed Chaos Engineering platform that offers various attack types, and LitmusChaos, an open-source tool for Chaos Engineering on Kubernetes.
Practical Chaos Engineering experiments require careful planning and execution. The planning stage involves defining the scope of the experiment, selecting the variables for chaos, establishing a hypothesis, and identifying key metrics.
For execution, start small – introduce a minor disruption in a controlled environment and observe. For example, Netflix may begin an experiment by shutting down a single server in their least trafficked region during off-peak hours.
One of the foundational principles of Chaos Engineering is to start with minimizing the ‘blast radius.’ The blast radius refers to the scope of impact of a chaos experiment. It should be as small as possible, to begin with, to prevent large-scale impact on the system or end-users. After that, the blast radius can be incrementally increased as the system proves its resilience.
For instance, Gremlin, a popular Chaos Engineering tool, allows you to control the blast radius of your experiments by selecting the percentage of resources that an experiment will affect, offering a “magnitude” slider that lets you easily adjust the intensity of the attack.
Automation plays a crucial role in Chaos Engineering. For example, once you have manually conducted a chaos experiment and learned from it, automating that experiment ensures that the system maintains its resilience against that type of failure.
Netflix, for instance, doesn’t manually shut down servers to test their system’s resilience. Instead, they have automated this process with Chaos Monkey, which continually conducts these experiments without human intervention.
Netflix, a pioneer of Chaos Engineering, created a suite of tools known as the Simian Army to test the resilience of their systems. Among these tools is Chaos Monkey, designed to shut down servers in the production environment randomly. Chaos Kong, another tool, simulates an outage of an entire AWS region to test the service’s ability to reroute traffic and maintain functionality. These continuous, automated tests have been instrumental in ensuring the resilience and high availability of Netflix’s global streaming service.
As one of the world’s leading cloud service providers, AWS must maintain extreme reliability across numerous services. As a result, they employ a practice known as “GameDays,” where they intentionally inject failures into their systems to identify vulnerabilities. They also developed the AWS Fault Injection Simulator, a tool that makes it easier to perform chaos experiments by providing a managed API for injecting faults. AWS has maintained impressive resilience through these methods while continually expanding its services.
Google’s approach to Chaos Engineering is characterized by its Disaster Recovery Testing (DiRT) program. In a DiRT exercise, Google intentionally introduces faults in their systems, ranging from server outages to natural disaster scenarios. These exercises test the resilience of Google’s complex, highly distributed systems and their engineers’ ability to respond to incidents effectively. This culture of learning from failure has helped Google build some of the most reliable services on the internet.
Facebook’s Chaos Engineering practices aim to ensure that the experiences of its billions of users remain uninterrupted, even in the face of potential failures. Through “Project Storm,” they simulate faults in their live systems to test their systems’ resilience and their teams’ incident response capabilities. This proactive approach enables Facebook to anticipate and resolve potential issues before they affect end users.
LinkedIn also practices Chaos Engineering to ensure the reliability of its professional networking platform. They developed a tool called WaterBear, which allows them to introduce and control network failures at various levels of their application stack. This approach has allowed LinkedIn to build a more resilient platform and ensure a consistent experience for its users.
Slack, a leading communication platform, uses Chaos Engineering to test the robustness of its services, ensuring that it can handle unexpected disruptions. In addition, they follow an incremental approach, starting from a small blast radius and gradually expanding as their confidence in the system’s resilience increases. This approach has been crucial in maintaining Slack’s reliability, especially as its usage has recently surged.
These case studies show that Chaos Engineering is a fundamental practice for companies seeking to provide robust, reliable services in today’s complex digital landscape.
Continuous Chaos Engineering takes the practice further by integrating chaos experiments into the continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipeline. This approach ensures system resilience is tested consistently and frequently, not just during dedicated Chaos Engineering exercises.
Companies like Gremlin are leading the way in Continuous Chaos Engineering. They offer features that integrate with CI/CD pipelines, enabling the automatic execution of chaos experiments whenever new code is deployed. This approach allows teams to catch and address potential vulnerabilities before they make it to the production environment.
Serverless architectures, where cloud providers dynamically manage the allocation and provisioning of servers, present unique challenges for Chaos Engineering. For example, traditional chaos experiments like shutting down servers are less relevant in these environments. Instead, the focus shifts to other disruptions, such as cold starts, third-party service failures, or sudden increases in demand.
Thundra, a monitoring and observability platform, has developed a Chaos Engineering tool specifically for serverless architectures. It enables teams to simulate different types of failures in their serverless applications, helping ensure their resilience in the face of unpredictable events.
AI and Machine Learning systems bring their complexities and potential points of failure, making Chaos Engineering crucial. For example, experiments might focus on data integrity, where corrupted or skewed data is introduced to test the system’s robustness, or on the reliability of AI inference, where models are deliberately made unavailable.
Uber, for instance, has built a resilient ML platform that includes chaos testing to ensure its models deliver reliable results even when faced with disruptions. By introducing artificial faults into their ML pipelines, they can verify the resilience of their models and rectify potential vulnerabilities.
Chaos Engineering can also be applied in the field of cybersecurity. By simulating security incidents, organizations can test their systems’ technical defenses and incident response capabilities.
Companies like Capital One have adopted this approach. They have a dedicated team called Chaos SWAT, which regularly conducts “Security Chaos Engineering” exercises. These include injecting faults into their systems to simulate security incidents, helping them test their defenses, and improving their response to actual security threats.
By extending Chaos Engineering to these advanced concepts, organizations can ensure robustness and resilience in the face of an ever-evolving landscape of potential disruptions.
For Chaos Engineering to succeed, it requires a team with a unique mix of skills. Typically, this includes software engineers, SREs (Site Reliability Engineers), and individuals with a solid understanding of system architecture and operation. In addition, the team should be capable of building and maintaining tools for chaos experiments, analyzing system behavior, and implementing improvements based on the insights gained.
Take the case of Netflix. They have a dedicated team, known as the CORE (Critical Operations and Reliability Engineering) team, responsible for creating and maintaining Chaos Monkey and other chaos tools. They also foster a culture of learning from failures across all engineering teams, encouraging everyone to contribute to the resilience of their systems.
Creating a Chaos Engineering process involves defining the steps to design, execute, and learn from chaos experiments. These steps typically include the following:
Define a hypothesis about system behavior
Identify the metrics to monitor during the experiment
Plan and execute the chaos experiment
Analyze the results
Rinse and repeat
Companies like Gremlin offer a platform that supports this process, helping teams design, run, and analyze chaos experiments, making establishing and maintaining a Chaos Engineering process easier.
While Chaos Engineering is about injecting failures into a system, it’s not about creating chaos for chaos’s sake. Instead, it’s a controlled process, and mitigating risks is a critical part of that.
This can be achieved through careful planning, starting with a small blast radius, running initial tests in staging environments before moving to production, and always having a rollback plan. Google, for example, incorporates these safety measures in their DiRT (Disaster Recovery Testing) exercises, ensuring that the potential impact on their services and users is minimized.
Scaling Chaos Engineering involves expanding its scope across multiple teams and systems in the organization. This requires not just technical tools and practices but also cultural changes.
Facebook’s “Project Storm” is an excellent example of this. What started as small-scale chaos experiments gradually scaled to encompass the entire organization, fostering a culture of learning from failures and improving system resilience across all teams.
Evaluating the effectiveness of Chaos Engineering involves measuring how the system’s resilience has improved due to chaos experiments. For example, reduced system downtime, quicker recovery times, fewer incidents, and improved user experience can gauge this.
For instance, Amazon Web Services tracks the number and severity of incidents over time, using this data to measure the effectiveness of their GameDays and other Chaos Engineering practices. They’ve found that these practices have contributed significantly to the reliability and resilience of their services.
Developing a Chaos Engineering strategy requires careful thought and planning, but the right approach can significantly enhance the resilience of an organization’s systems.
As more organizations recognize the value of Chaos Engineering, its adoption is predicted to increase. It will likely become a standard practice in software development, similar to unit testing or continuous integration. For sure, there will be more tools and platforms dedicated to Chaos Engineering, making it more accessible to teams of all sizes.
Furthermore, the scope of Chaos Engineering will expand. For instance, as AI and machine learning systems become more prevalent, we’ll see more chaos experiments focused on these areas. Chaos Engineering will also play a greater role in cybersecurity, with more organizations using it to test their defenses and incident response capabilities.
Chaos Engineering will ensure system resilience as technology evolves and systems become more complex. In the era of microservices and serverless architectures, traditional testing methods are insufficient, and Chaos Engineering provides a way to test systems in a realistic environment.
For example, companies like Amazon and Google already leverage Chaos Engineering to test their serverless offerings. This allows them to ensure that these services are reliable and resilient, providing a solid foundation innovative applications built on these platforms.
Several trends are emerging in Chaos Engineering. One is the focus on automating chaos experiments. As organizations strive to move faster and deliver more frequently, they’re automating more aspects of their development process, and Chaos Engineering is no exception.
Another trend is the shift towards ‘continuous’ Chaos Engineering. Like continuous integration or delivery, the goal is to run chaos experiments frequently and consistently rather than as a one-off event. This approach allows teams to catch potential issues earlier and ensures their systems are constantly validated for resilience.
Finally, we’re seeing more organizations extend Chaos Engineering beyond their technical systems. They’re applying the principles of Chaos Engineering to their business processes, testing how they respond to disruptions such as market changes or operational incidents. This ‘Business Chaos Engineering’ allows organizations to build resilience at all levels, not just in their technical infrastructure.
In summary, the future of Chaos Engineering looks promising. As it evolves and matures, it will become even more integral to developing and operating reliable, resilient systems.
The first step for organizations looking to implement Chaos Engineering is to build a dedicated team or assign a group of engineers to explore the practice. Begin with small experiments, gradually expanding the scope as your confidence grows. Start in a testing or staging environment and slowly move to production once a transparent process and proper safeguards are in place.
Invest in Chaos Engineering tools that suit your needs. Depending on your requirements, this could be open-source tools like Chaos Monkey or more advanced platforms like Gremlin or Thundra.
Finally, make Chaos Engineering a part of your culture. Encourage a mindset of learning from failures and continually improving system resilience.
As the field of Chaos Engineering continues to evolve, it will likely become a standard practice in software development, akin to unit testing or continuous integration. Furthermore, it represents a significant shift in how we approach reliability, emphasizing proactive disruption over passive observation.
While intentionally breaking things may seem counterintuitive, the benefits of uncovering system vulnerabilities early, learning from them, and building more resilient systems are substantial.
As Werner Vogels, CTO of Amazon, famously said, “Everything fails all the time.” Chaos Engineering helps us prepare for these failures, ensuring that our systems can handle them gracefully when they occur.
Chaos Engineering: Intentionally injecting failures into systems to discover and rectify vulnerabilities.
Chaos Experiment: A controlled test where failures are introduced into a system to observe its reaction.
Steady State: The regular operation of a system that serves as a baseline for Chaos Engineering experiments.
Blast Radius: The extent of the system that could be affected by a Chaos Engineering experiment.
GameDay: A scheduled event where teams conduct chaos experiments to learn about their system’s reliability.
Fault Injection: Intentionally introducing faults into a system to test its resilience.
Resilience: The ability of a system to recover quickly from failures and continue to provide its intended functionality.
Books: “Chaos Engineering: System Resiliency in Practice” by Casey Rosenthal and Nora Jones; “Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems” by Betsy Beyer, Chris Jones, Jennifer Petoff, and Niall Richard Murphy.
Online courses: “Chaos Engineering” on Coursera; “Mastering Chaos Engineering” on Udemy.
Blogs and Websites: Netflix’s Tech Blog, Gremlin’s Community site, AWS Architecture Blog.
Conferences and Meetups: Chaos Conf, SREcon, Chaos Community Day.
Chaos Monkey: An open-source tool developed by Netflix that randomly terminates instances in production to ensure that engineers implement their services to be resilient to instance failures.
Gremlin: A fully-featured Chaos Engineering platform offering various fault injection techniques and safety measures.
Chaos Toolkit: An open-source Chaos Engineering tool that aims to be the easiest way to explore and ultimately automate your system’s weaknesses.
LitmusChaos: An open-source Chaos Engineering platform for Kubernetes that helps SREs find weaknesses in their deployments.
Simian Army: A suite of tools developed by Netflix for testing the resilience of their systems in the AWS cloud.
Chaos Mesh: A cloud-native Chaos Engineering platform orchestrates chaos experiments on Kubernetes environments.
Thundra: An observability and Chaos Engineering platform for serverless architectures.
Individual License: Where we offer an individual license, you can use the deliverable for personal use. You pay only once for using the deliverable forever. You are entitled any new updates within 12 months.
Enterprise License: If you are representing a company, irrespective of size, and intend to use the deliverables as a part of your enterprise transformation, the enterprise license is applicable in your situation. You pay only once for using the deliverable forever. You are entitled any new updates within 12 months.
Consultancy License: A consulting or professional services or IT services company that intends to use the deliverables for their client work need to pay the consultancy license fee. You pay only once for using the deliverable forever. You are entitled any new updates within 12 months.
We are sorry, but we cannot send or show sample deliverables. There are two reasons: A) The deliverables are our intellectual property, and we cannot share the same. B) While you may be a genuine buyer, our experience in the past has not been great with too many browsers and not many buyers. We believe the depth of the information in the product description and the snippets we provide are sufficient to understand the scope and quality of our products.
We process each transaction manually and hence, processing a deliverable may take anywhere from a few minutes to up to a day. The reason is to ensure appropriate licensing and also validating the deliverables.
Your best bet is to log in to the portal and download the products from the included links. The links do not expire.
Yes. You can only download the products three times. We believe that is sufficient for any genuine usage situation. Of course, once you download, you can save electronic copies to your computer or a cloud drive.
You can share the deliverables within a company for proper use. You cannot share the deliverables outside your company. Selling or giving away free is prohibited, as well.
Not generally. Compared to our professional services fee, the price of our products is a fraction of what we charge for custom work. Hence, our business model does not support pre-sales support.
Yes, for a separate fee. You can hire our consultants for remote help and in some cases for onsite assistance. Please Contact Us.